St. Bonaventure Bonnies vs East Carolina Pirates Advanced Game Analysis
St. Bonaventure Bonnies vs East Carolina Pirates Advanced Game Analysis – NCAA Men’s Basketball Nov.27, 2025 Matchup Preview Metric
St. Bonaventure Bonnies vs East Carolina Pirates Advanced Game Analysis – NCAA Men’s Basketball Nov.27, 2025
Matchup Preview
| Metric | St. Bonaventure Bonnies | East Carolina Pirates |
|---|---|---|
| Current Record | 5–1 | 2–5 |
| Offensive Efficiency Rank | 87th (1.121 pts/poss) | 312th (0.922 pts/poss) |
| Points Per Game | 78.4 (#136) | 69.0 (#274) |
| Opponent Points Per Game Allowed | 68.0 (#56) | 85.4 (#314) |
| Average Scoring Margin | +10.4 (#91) | −16.4 (#328) |
| Assists Per Game | 16.0 (#88) | 10.2 (#335) |
| Total Rebounds Per Game | 38.2 (#103) | 35.6 (#180) |
| Opponent Rebounds Per Game Allowed | 28.6 (#10) | 36.2 (#198) |
Team Profile
St. Bonaventure Bonnies Team Profile
St. Bonaventure has opened this season with a profile that looks built for March, not just for a holiday week tournament. The Bonnies are scoring 78.4 points per game while allowing only 68.0, producing a double digit average margin and sitting inside the top 100 nationally in scoring differential and overall efficiency. Their offense is a modern blend of ball screens, four out spacing, and inside out play through a physical frontcourt, but the identity starts with how connected they are. Most made shots are assisted, and the ball rarely stops for long on one side of the floor.
In the half court, St. Bonaventure uses staggered screens and dribble handoffs to force defenders to navigate traffic. Guards are comfortable operating in tight windows, snaking ball screens and skipping passes to the weak side when the defense overplays the roll. The three point line is not just a bailout option, it is a weapon. The Bonnies sit in the top tier of offensive efficiency with a rating of 1.121 points per possession and a balanced shot chart that mixes strong perimeter shooting with steady two point production. When possessions slow down late in the clock, they can still create a quality look through quick middle pick and roll or a high low passing sequence.
Defensively, St. Bonaventure is similarly composed. They hold opponents to 68.0 points per game, with one of the better opponent rebounding numbers in the country, giving up only 28.6 boards per night. They control the glass with fundamentals more than raw size, checking bodies early and tracking long rebounds on missed threes. Their scheme is primarily man to man with selective ball pressure. Help is early rather than late, which means opponents rarely get completely clean drives. When they do allow penetration, the second and third defenders are ready to rotate, force kick outs, and contest at the arc. The net result is a team that wins both the efficiency and effort battles more often than not.
East Carolina Pirates 2025–2026 Team Profile
East Carolina is still searching for stability. The Pirates are averaging 69.0 points per game while allowing 85.4, a negative margin of −16.4 that places them near the bottom of the national standings in scoring differential. Offensively, they are grinding through possessions rather than dictating terms. An offensive efficiency of 0.922 points per possession and a ranking in the 300s tell the story of a team struggling to convert opportunities into points.
The Pirates still have some clear strengths. They can attack the paint off the dribble, and when they get the ball inside, they finish decently well at the rim. Their two point scoring is more reliable than their perimeter shooting, which has lagged behind and forced them into tougher midrange attempts or forced drives late in the clock. Assists per field goal made are low, and assists per game sit near the bottom nationally, which hints at more isolation and fewer high level reads in the half court. When the ball does move side to side and they play inside out, their offense looks much more dangerous than the raw numbers suggest.
Defensively, East Carolina is in a difficult place. Opponents are putting up 85.4 points per game, and the Pirates are near the bottom of Division I in opponent assists and opponent scoring margin. They give up both clean looks at the arc and comfortable catches in the mid post, which forces the back line into constant emergency help. That, in turn, opens the glass, where they are close to even in rebounding instead of dominant. When their ball pressure is timed correctly and they can turn live ball steals into transition offense, they look much better. When they are stuck in extended half court defensive sequences, coverage gaps and late rotations quickly show.
Team Identity
St. Bonaventure Identity Snapshot
- Tempo: Moderately controlled, comfortable in structured games
- Play style: Connected half court offense with strong passing and spacing
- Offense focus: Efficiency and shot quality over raw pace 🔥
- Defense focus: Rebounding, positioning, and limiting second chances
East Carolina Identity Snapshot
- Tempo: More comfortable when games tilt faster, especially in transition 🔥🔥
- Play style: Drive heavy offense with streaky perimeter shooting
- Offense focus: Paint touches and free throw opportunities
- Defense focus: Pressure on the ball, searching for disruption but vulnerable in rotations
High Level Team Comparison
In simple terms, St. Bonaventure is the polished half court machine, and East Carolina is the scrappy underdog looking for volatility. The Bonnies want to win through disciplined possessions, smart shot selection, and sustained defensive effort. Their efficiency numbers and scoring margin suggest that style scales well against a variety of opponents.
East Carolina, on the other hand, is trying to fight out of an early season hole. Their current statistical profile shows a team that has to manufacture advantages through tempo, energy, and attacking mindset rather than raw efficiency. They thrive when games get a little messy, when turnovers and fast break chances appear, and when they can string together aggressive drives that get them to the line. The matchup is less about talent in a vacuum and more about whether the Pirates can pull the Bonnies out of their comfort zone for long stretches.
By the Numbers
Scoring & Efficiency
Points Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 78.4 (#136) ✅ East Carolina: 69.0 (#274) Opponent Points Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 68.0 (#56) ✅ East Carolina: 85.4 (#314) Average Scoring Margin: St. Bonaventure: +10.4 (#91) ✅ East Carolina: −16.4 (#328)
Playmaking & Ball Movement
Assists Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 16.0 (#88) ✅ East Carolina: 10.2 (#335) Assists / Turnover: St. Bonaventure: 1.29 (#106) East Carolina: 0.73 (#329)
Rebounding
Total Rebounds Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 38.2 (#103) ✅ East Carolina: 35.6 (#180) Opponent Rebounds Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 28.6 (#10) ✅ East Carolina: 36.2 (#198)
Offensive Efficiency Snapshot 🔥
Offensive Efficiency: St. Bonaventure: 1.121 pts/poss (87th) ✅ East Carolina: 0.922 pts/poss (312th) Offensive Profile Summary: St. Bonaventure: Above average efficiency, strong balance of inside and outside scoring East Carolina: Below average efficiency, more reliant on individual shot creation
Defensive Pressure Indicators
Opponent Assists Per Game: St. Bonaventure: 12.4 (#115) East Carolina: 17.4 (#329) Assists Allowed / FGM: St. Bonaventure: 0.512 (#154) East Carolina: 0.613 (#324)
Advanced Metrics and Tempo Analysis
Shot Quality Differential 🔥
Shot Quality Differential looks at expected points per shot based on location and context, then compares that to results. St. Bonaventure’s offensive and defensive numbers hint at a positive differential. They create efficient looks through ball movement and limit easy chances for opponents, as shown by their strong scoring margin and low opponent rebounding. East Carolina, by contrast, has a heavily negative scoring margin and allows opponents to pile up points and assists, which suggests they are losing the shot quality battle on both ends.
Projected Shot Quality Differential (this season) St. Bonaventure: ████████████████ Clearly positive East Carolina: ████░░░░░░░░░░ Negative, high variance
Rim and Perimeter Defense Split
St. Bonaventure’s defensive profile indicates a team that can close possessions and avoid giving up high efficiency paint touches on a regular basis. Their opponent rebounding numbers and modest opponent scoring totals support the idea that they limit second chance points and force a lot of contested looks. East Carolina, on the other hand, allows opponents to score freely and rack up assists, which usually means both rim and perimeter coverage breakdowns are happening too often.
Rim Defense (allowed efficiency - projected) St. Bonaventure: ███████████░░ Strong protection and help East Carolina: ████░░░░░░░░ Vulnerable on drives and put backs Perimeter Defense (allowed 3s and kick outs - projected) St. Bonaventure: ████████████ Solid closeouts, fewer clean looks East Carolina: █████░░░░░░░ Late rotations, open spot ups
Lineup Stability Index
Lineup Stability Index reflects how consistently coaches ride a core rotation versus constantly mixing lineups in search of answers. St. Bonaventure generally prefers a defined rotation, which fits their structured offensive and defensive identities. That stability supports their communication and spacing. East Carolina is more likely to cycle through combinations, hunting for energy and matchups that work on a given night. That flexibility can generate a spark, but it also risks further inconsistency in an already volatile profile.
Lineup Stability (projected) St. Bonaventure: ██████████████ High stability East Carolina: ██████░░░░░░░ Moderate, searching for best mix
Momentum Swing Index 🔥🔥🔥
Momentum Swing Index measures how quickly a team can flip a game through scoring bursts and defensive runs. St. Bonaventure’s runs tend to be built on serial stops and efficient sets, so their swings are steady rather than explosive. East Carolina, despite the poor overall numbers, still has spurts where their pressure and dribble attacks generate rapid swings. The issue is consistency. For the Pirates, big positive swings are often followed by equally big negative stretches when the defense breaks down and shot selection slips.
Momentum Swing Index (this season, projected) St. Bonaventure: ███████░░░░░ Moderate, built on control East Carolina: ██████████░░ High swing potential, but unstable 🔥🔥🔥
Pace and Efficiency Battle
This matchup boils down to whether East Carolina can turn the game into a tempo contest or whether St. Bonaventure can keep it in the efficiency lane. The Bonnies are comfortable in games where each possession is valued and every shot is the product of multiple actions. They can live in scores in the low to mid 70s and still create separation because of their balanced offense and solid defense. East Carolina is better off in a game that feels slightly hectic, with more possessions, more scramble situations, and more chances for their athletes to make plays off script.
If St. Bonaventure holds the Pirates close to their current scoring average and forces them to execute in the half court, the Bonnies efficiency edge on both ends becomes very difficult to overcome. If East Carolina can push the game into the upper 70s or low 80s and turn it into a transition heavy contest, they increase the variance and give themselves more opportunities to ride a hot stretch of shot making or whistle friendly drives to the rim.
Offense vs Defense Matchups
St. Bonaventure Offense vs East Carolina Defense 🔥
This side of the ball clearly favors St. Bonaventure on paper. The Bonnies pair above average efficiency with strong passing and a willingness to trust the extra pass. They are likely to test every layer of East Carolina’s defense, from ball screen coverage at the point of attack to help rotations on the back line. Given how many points the Pirates have surrendered and how many assists they allow per game, St. Bonaventure’s drive and kick sequences, back cuts, and inside out action all profile as recurring sources of clean looks.
East Carolina Offense vs St. Bonaventure Defense 🔥
This matchup is more nuanced. St. Bonaventure’s defense has been statistically strong, but East Carolina does have guards who can get downhill and finish or draw contact. If the Pirates can generate repeated paint touches and follow those up with kick outs to competent shooters, they can stress the Bonnies help rules. The challenge is sustaining that for full halves rather than short stretches. The numbers suggest St. Bonaventure is more likely to win the long game on this side of the ball, but if East Carolina finds an attacking guard who is in rhythm, this is where they could outperform their season averages.
Key Players
St. Bonaventure Bonnies
- Primary guard creator 🔥: The lead guard in St. Bonaventure’s system is responsible for far more than just bringing the ball up. They are the trigger for most actions, deciding when to flow into ball screens, when to hit the trail big, and when to reverse the ball quickly to open up weak side cuts. Against East Carolina’s inconsistent defense, their poise and vision are critical. If they take care of the ball and read help correctly, the Bonnies can repeatedly generate high value looks.
- Wing shooter and connector: St. Bonaventure’s best wing shooter stretches the floor and punishes any overhelp from the Pirates. They must be ready to fire on catch and shoot chances and stay active off the ball with corner relocations and 45 degree cuts. Defensively, this same player is often tasked with checking one of East Carolina’s key perimeter scorers, making them a two way swing piece.
- Interior anchor: The Bonnies primary big anchors both the defensive glass and much of the interior offense. Their screening angles free guards, and their ability to catch in traffic and finish or kick out to shooters is what allows St. Bonaventure to maintain spacing even when they play through the post. On defense, controlling the glass and walling up without fouling are top priorities against a Pirates team that needs paint points to survive.
East Carolina Pirates
- High usage slashing guard 🔥🔥: East Carolina’s primary creator has to set the tone. They will be challenged to attack gaps, collapse St. Bonaventure’s defense, and create both their own shots and opportunities for others. Their balance between aggression and control will decide whether the Pirates are generating quality drives or just forcing contested attempts into traffic.
- Floor spacing wing: The Pirates need at least one perimeter threat who can force St. Bonaventure to respect the arc. If this player can hit a couple of early threes, it stretches the Bonnies help and can open driving lanes for teammates. If they struggle, the paint shrinks and East Carolina’s already thin margins become even tighter.
- Physical big and rim presence: East Carolina’s main interior presence must battle on the glass and give the Pirates some defensive resistance at the rim. On offense, rolls to the basket, duck ins, and second chance finishes can help tilt the possession count in their favor. On defense, they cannot afford to get pulled into foul trouble, or St. Bonaventure’s interior scoring threats will gain a major edge.
Coaching Impact
St. Bonaventure’s staff leans into structure. Their approach emphasizes detailed scouting, clear terminology, and repetition of core actions until players can run them comfortably against a variety of coverages. In this matchup, expect an emphasis on strong floor balance to limit East Carolina transition, controlled aggression on the offensive glass, and disciplined closeouts that run the Pirates off the three point line while still protecting the paint.
East Carolina’s staff has to manage a different challenge. With current efficiency and margin numbers stacked against them, they are incentivized to experiment with lineup combinations, pressures, and tempo triggers that can create volatility. Expect to see press looks after made baskets, early offense calls on rebound outlets, and situational trapping to try to force the Bonnies into uncomfortable spots. Their game plan will likely prioritize increasing possession count and manufacturing extra opportunities through turnovers and offensive rebounds.
Risk Matrix and Scenario Paths
- Low variance path: St. Bonaventure keeps turnovers down, controls the glass, and limits East Carolina’s transition looks. The game stays mostly in the 60s or low 70s with long half court possessions. This path heavily favors the Bonnies, who can steadily build separation through efficiency on both ends.
- Medium variance path: East Carolina creates a few meaningful runs through pressure and shot making, but St. Bonaventure responds with counters and stabilizes the tempo. The score moves into the low to mid 70s, and key sequences late in each half decide the margin. The Bonnies still have the analytical edge, but the Pirates have windows to make it interesting.
- High variance path 🔥: The Pirates successfully speed up the game. Turnovers rise, both teams play faster than usual, and transition chances appear frequently. The score climbs toward the high 70s or low 80s. In that environment, East Carolina’s ability to string together aggressive drives and opportunistic threes gives them their best chance to punch above their season numbers.
In Game Levers and Live Adjustments
Several specific levers will determine how this matchup unfolds. One is St. Bonaventure’s turnover count. If they stay close to or below their usual level of ball security, they will significantly limit East Carolina’s transition attack. Another is East Carolina’s offensive rebounding. Stealing extra possessions on the glass can help offset their efficiency gap and create second chance threes or put backs.
Foul distribution is another key variable. If the Pirates can put real pressure on the paint and draw fouls on St. Bonaventure’s frontcourt, the Bonnies rotations and rim protection could be stressed. Conversely, if East Carolina’s main interior players pick up early fouls, their already vulnerable defense will be stretched thin. Expect both coaching staffs to adjust pick and roll coverages, pressing frequency, and lineups based on how these levers move throughout the game.
Simulation Outlook and Analytical Lean
If you run a broad set of simulations grounded in current efficiency, scoring margin, and team style, a clear pattern emerges. St. Bonaventure wins most of the low and medium variance games. Their edges in offensive efficiency, defensive performance, and rebounding create a stable base that holds up even when shooting luck fluctuates. East Carolina’s wins tend to cluster in scenarios where they significantly outperform their season shooting averages and generate a high volume of high value transition opportunities.
The largest gap appears on the defensive side. The Bonnies have shown they can hold opponents below their norms and control the glass, while the Pirates have allowed heavy scoring and high assist totals. That means St. Bonaventure does not need perfection to cover the efficiency difference. They need to be themselves. East Carolina, in contrast, needs a combination of shot making spikes, whistle friendly drives, and disruptive defensive stretches to flip the expected story.
Final Forecast and Advanced Game Summary
Putting everything together, St. Bonaventure carries the stronger, more stable profile. They have the better offensive efficiency, the better defense, and a substantially better scoring margin. Their approach, based on structure and connected play, is specifically designed to minimize the chaos that East Carolina needs to maximize. If the Bonnies maintain composure against pressure, share the ball at their usual rate, and dominate the defensive glass, they should control the game across most of the forty minutes.
East Carolina’s path to an upset is narrow but clear. They need to use tempo and aggression to turn this into a game of runs rather than a game of steady execution. That means forcing turnovers, hitting timely threes, and winning the free throw and offensive rebounding battles. If those boxes are checked, they can push St. Bonaventure into a tighter than expected contest. If not, the numbers strongly favor the Bonnies pulling away.
Final Projection
St. Bonaventure 80 – East Carolina 67
St. Bonaventure wins the shot quality, rebounding, and defensive consistency battles, controlling pace and scoreboard pressure throughout.
For the best odds on NCAA College football games, visit bet105, the top sportsbook with reduced juice, fast crypto payouts and sharp-friendly limits.
Disclaimer
This analysis uses AI-assisted statistical research alongside human analysis and editorial oversight. Despite verification efforts, data errors may occur. Readers should independently verify odds, fighter stats, and records before betting. Projections are analytical estimates, not guarantees.



