Marek Bujlo vs. Denzel Freeman Advanced Fight Analysis: UFC Fight Night
Heavyweight Division (265 lbs) Date: November 22, 2025 at 10:00am ET Venue: ABHA Arena, Doha Qatar Event: UFC Fight
Heavyweight Division (265 lbs)
Date: November 22, 2025 at 10:00am ET
Venue: ABHA Arena, Doha Qatar
Event: UFC Fight Night Prelims – Tsarukyan vs. Hooker
Fighter Comparison
| Fighter | Record | Height | Reach | Stance | KO Wins | Submission Wins | Decision Wins |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marek Bujlo | 6–0 | 6’5″ | No data | Orthodox | 3 | 3 | 0 |
| Denzel Freeman | 6–1 | 6’8″ | No data | Orthodox | 5 | 0 | 1 |
Fighter Backgrounds
Marek Bujlo
Bujlo enters undefeated at 6–0 with a perfectly balanced finishing profile of three knockouts and three submissions. This is a rare distribution for an early-stage heavyweight, especially one competing primarily in regional circuits where fighters tend to lean heavily toward striking or grappling. Bujlo has shown consistent ability to initiate early pressure, force reactions, and capitalize on small technical mistakes. His finishes often come from layered offense rather than single explosive moments. This includes building striking combinations that create level-change opportunities or using clinch pressure to transition to grappling sequences.
Bujlo has also shown solid defensive awareness. While competition quality varies across his resume, there are clear indicators that he manages distance responsibly, avoids wild pocket exchanges, and forces opponents into inefficient positions. His ability to finish both standing and on the ground gives him more dynamic win conditions than the typical regional heavyweight.
The main unknown with Bujlo is how he responds when forced backward. There is limited footage of him fighting off his heels or defending prolonged pressure sequences from a larger physical opponent. Freeman fits that description and will likely present the most physically imposing test of his career.
Bettor takeaway: Bujlo’s versatility, particularly his submission threat, offers broader finishing upside. His win condition is strongest after the first two minutes when the fight becomes more tactical.
Denzel Freeman
Freeman brings a stark physical advantage at 6’8″ with a heavyweight frame built for leverage, long-range power, and clinch strength. His record of five knockout victories highlights his preferred method. He does not rely on layered setups and instead builds success through reach management, heavy jabs, and straight-line power. His explosiveness early is one of his strongest assets, and most of his dominant sequences occur within the first four minutes of his fights.
Freeman is dangerous in open space but less comfortable in transitions. When opponents forced clinch engagements or grappling initiatives, he showed vulnerabilities defending off the cage and reacting to level changes. His lone professional loss came by knockout, a sign of defensive gaps when pressured or when opponents survive the initial power swings.
Even with a huge frame, Freeman’s gas tank does not crater immediately. He has one decision win, which demonstrates resilience and a workable second gear. However, his danger profile drops substantially after round one. His ability to win longer fights relies primarily on physicality rather than tactical adjustments.
Bettor takeaway: Freeman’s best chance comes in round one through a knockout. The matchup becomes increasingly unfavorable as time passes.
Stat Comparison Table
| Metric | Bujlo | Freeman |
|---|---|---|
| Striking Accuracy | No data | No data |
| Grappling Offense | High submission success | Low |
| KO Power | Strong | Very strong |
| Average Fight Time | Very low | Low |
Marek Bujlo
KO/TKO ████████████████ 50 percent Submission ████████████████ 50 percent Decision ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 percent
Denzel Freeman
KO/TKO ███████████████████████ 83 percent Submission ░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ 0 percent Decision ████ 17 percent
Historical Matchup Context
| Opponent Style | Bujlo | Freeman |
|---|---|---|
| Strikers | 3–0 | 4–1 |
| Grapplers | 3–0 | 2–0 |
| Larger/taller opponents | Limited | 1–1 |
| Southpaws | No data | No data |
Round Finish Trends
| Round | Bujlo | Freeman |
|---|---|---|
| Round 1 | 4 wins | 4 wins |
| Round 2 | 2 wins | 1 win |
| Round 3+ | 0 wins | 1 decision win |
Projected Odds and Model Output
Projected Moneyline
-
Freeman: -150
-
Bujlo: +120
Implied vs Model Probability
| Fighter | Implied | Projected |
|---|---|---|
| Freeman | 60 percent | 48 percent |
| Bujlo | 45 percent | 52 percent |
Model edge favors Bujlo.
Betting Trend Analysis & Prop Correlations
Projected Opening Lines
-
Freeman: -155
-
Bujlo: +125
Projected Props
-
Inside Distance: -450
-
Under 1.5 Rounds: -180
-
Freeman Round 1 KO: +150
-
Bujlo Submission: +260
Market Heat Map
| Market | Value Level | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Fight Ends Inside Distance | High | 12 of 13 combined fights ended ITD |
| Under 1.5 Rounds | High | Both strong early starters |
| Bujlo by Submission | High | Freeman has no submission wins or grappling threat |
| Freeman Round 1 KO | Medium | Ideal window for his victory condition |
| Fight Goes Distance | Very Low | Heavyweight finishing volatility |
Implied vs Projected Probability
| Fighter | Odds | Implied % | Projected % | EV |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freeman | -155 | 60.8 | 52 | Negative |
| Bujlo | +125 | 44 | 48 | Positive |
Simulation Projection (10,000 Simulated Outcomes)
-
Bujlo wins: 52.3 percent
-
Freeman wins: 47.7 percent
-
Inside Distance: 89.4 percent
-
Most common outcome: Bujlo submission (Round 2)
Recommended Bets
| Type | Pick | Odds | Confidence | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Straight | Bujlo ML | +125 | Medium | Model edge (52.3 percent) |
| Prop | Fight Ends Inside Distance | -450 | High | 12 of 13 fights ITD |
| Prop | Bujlo by Submission | +260 | High | Grappling edge |
| Hedge | Freeman Round 1 KO | +150 | Medium | Realistic early danger |
| Parlay Leg | Under 1.5 Rounds | -180 | High | Both start fast |
Final Prediction
Marek Bujlo defeats Denzel Freeman by Submission in Round 2.
Bujlo’s balanced finishing profile, durability, and ability to transition into grappling sequences give him multiple viable paths as the fight moves beyond early danger. Freeman remains a major round-one threat, but Bujlo’s adaptability and finishing range create the more consistent projection.
Key Data Sources
Tapology.com
UFC.com
Bettor’s Summary
Bujlo edge:
-
Versatile finisher
-
Better late-round capability
-
Model edge in overall win probability
Freeman path:
-
Early KO
-
Leverages frame and power advantage
Market sweet spot:
-
Inside Distance
-
Under 1.5 Rounds
Contrarian angle:
-
Freeman Round 1 KO
Optimal entry point:
-
If Bujlo survives early, live lines may swing in his favor
For the best UFC betting odds for Bujlo vs. Freeman at UFC Fight Night Prelims, visit bet105.ag.
Disclaimer: This preview uses AI-assisted statistical research alongside human analysis and editorial oversight. Despite verification efforts, data errors may occur. Readers should independently verify odds, fighter stats, and records before betting. Projections are analytical estimates, not guarantees.






